Tag: Social media

When Corporations Forget

October 31st, 2009
images

Forgetting Is Only Acceptable for Charming Little Puppets

My grandmother used to say to me that I’ve forgotten more than she’d ever known. (She was just trying to be kind, boost my confidence. :) ) What’s curious from a KM perspective is that that statement – that one may forget more than another ever knows – isn’t just applicable to much-loved grandchildren… but, of course, to organizations.

Over 5 years ago, Andy Seidl (2004) wrote a great blog post about corporate amnesia – or organizational memory leak – which he argued was the result of “numerous, seemingly insignificant, day-to-day forgetting events”. The act of forgetting is a critical issue for KM in large organizations in particular, especially those with higher turnover rates.

What happens when knowledge walks out the door for the last time? What steps can an org take to avoid organizational memory leak?

I guess the bigger question is, Why would knowledge walk out the door for the last time in an enterprise-sized organization? In a small one with a few employees, sure – but in a large corporation with 250+ employees, there must be one or two who have similar jobs, use the same databases or shared drives, etc. No? So why then might an enterprise suffer from corporate amnesia?

Recent job cuts are a problem – especially when a corporation decides to cut a whole group, such as engineering/development, HR or Creative Services, in favour of outsourcing.

But what’s more interesting than that (because I’m sooooo tired of hearing about the tough economy) is the idea of social capital and tie-formation. More specifically, the idea that strong and weak ties can help people share knowledge across organizational boundaries. Check out this great article (1999) by Morten T. Hansen for more about search-transfer and weak ties The short story is that creating opportunities for people to network within an organization – for the third floor to mingle with the second – can actually help to prevent corporate memory loss.

Can technology help to avoid the loss of at least some organizational knowledge?

Seidl made a decent case for knowledge capture by means of internal blogging and fitting those intra-blogs into a federation of blogs (which he called a channel). He also offered an example of the success that this sort of knowledge capture achieved at a certain unnamed company, where the CEO insisted that everyone get involved in the “project blogsite”.

Today (yes, I know it’s just 5 years later), I think a lot of KM folks & employees alike would argue that being forced to contribute to a blog is… just… not… going… to… work. Further, with failed intra-blogging attempts abounding and the ongoing rhetoric of blogs as time-wasters doomed to failure, you’d be hard-pressed to find an enterprise-sized organization with a strong blogging community — a blogging community that’s able to effectively capture knowledge and a blogging culture that’s willing to visit said blogs to ascertain knowledge.

It seems there’s no affirmative response to the KM question: Can technology effectively capture both implicit & explicit knowledge? (Urgh! I so wish someone could build an app that would actually do this!)

But what, then, can we do about memory leak, about knowledge walking out the door? Pei-Wen Huang (n.d.) suggested a few solutions:

  • Create more apprenticeship programs
  • Debrief at the end of a project so people in & out of the project are brought into the loop about wins, failures, etc.
  • Establish a “corporate history”
  • Build “knowledge profiles” so you know whom to go to in an org for certain subjects

Apprenticeship programs are, of course, potentially expensive (but more expensive than losing a seasoned employee with high institutional knowledge?). The others seem simply time-consuming.

…There’s always an excuse, isn’t there? But I’m pretty sure shareholders wouldn’t want to hear that the corps they’ve invested in are “unable to commit the time” to holding 30-minute power-debriefs at the end of projects to avoid repeating mistakes & wasting money………

Well, if anyone has a better idea or wants to chime in on the above ideas – or simply wants to post a link to a blog on the topic – feel free. Looking forward to it…

~joanna

KM: News from the battlefield…

October 20th, 2009

laptop_on_battlefield

We are at war!


What if KM is not dead but merely mobilizing its troops for battle? And who is this dreaded enemy? The economic downturn? The naysayers of KM? No, the enemy is none other than social media (SM)! Yes, my friends, KM is embroiled in a full-on war, a generational war in which the Boomers battle the Millennials for the future of KM.

What is this war about?

Venkatesh Rao is the perceptive guy who first noticed the war. His full findings can be found in his blog post. Rao believes that we are in the middle of a hidden KM-SM war. The real cause of the war is a generational thing. KM was conceived as a top-down Boomer (b. 1946–1962) management effort, created by this generation just as it was moving into leadership positions. Social media, is a Millennial and Gen Y (b. 1980–) movement. This overall generational and cultural divide has shaped the ongoing corporate cultural war.

Rao goes on to conclude that the war will end when the Boomers retire and the Millenials win by default. KM will quietly die and SM will win the soul of Enterprise 2.0. The new leadership will quietly slip the best of KM ideas into SM without anyone knowing.

What do others think about the war?

David Snowden commented directly to Rao’s blog post noting that Boomers are actually amongst the highest adopters of social computing and that people do not have ideas and attitudes by age group. Andrew McAfee further cautions Rao about ageism in his blog post.

Regardless of whether we believe the so-called “KM-SM war”, it is encouraging to see the significance of the human element in generating a knowledge system that works. Davenport (2005) in his interviews with academics and professionals found that characteristics of a good KM system are ownership of knowledge by users and commitment from the organization to foster knowledge. Technology on its own cannot produce, though it may contribute to, an effective KM system.

While the “KM-SM war” rages on – mind you it seems to be completely undetected by most KM practitioners – there appears to be many organizations which have thankfully found ways to avoid casualties. Lamont (2008) supports the idea that social networking should be added to traditional KM offerings. Moreover, next-generation workers are not only accepting, but demanding increased interactivity. People have a natural tendency to share, but the rigidity of KM systems actually discourages them from doing so. Lamont (2008) goes on to mention several vendors of KM products who have implemented social networking including Vignette, Mzinga and Ektron.

What we can take away

  • We are in a battle between KM and SM
  • SM is organic and energetic while KM is mechanical and structured
  • KM will die a slow death as the Boomers retire and SM will win the war
  • Regardless of the war, the human element is becoming an important factor in KM

IMHO, the so-called “KM-SM war” is a great marketing gimmick to bring some much-needed attention to KM. Just as a war typically stimulates the economy and creates jobs, applying the term “war” to KM brings a little excitement to the topic. However, I believe we can combine KM and SM quite effortless and hopefully without any ammunition!

~ Sarah

Do you think there is a war between KM and SM?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Read more at…

Davenport, R. (2005). Why does knowledge management still matter? Training and Development 59(2), 18-25. Retrieved September 26, 2009 from ABI/INFORM Global.

Lamont, J. (2008, June). Social networking: KM and beyond. KM World, 17(6), 12-13. Retrieved September 27, 2009,from Academic Search Complete database.

Rao, V. (20008, September 28). Social media vs. knowledge management: A generational war. Blog post from http://enterprise2blog.com/2008/09/social-media-vs-knowledge-management-a-generational-war/